УКРАЇНСЬКО-КАНАДСЬКИЙ ЧАСОПИС «НОВИЙ ШЛЯХ»: ПЕРІОД СТАНОВЛЕННЯ ТА РОЗБУДОВИ (1930–1941)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to determine the peculiarities of the formation and development of the Ukrainian periodical in emigration, which provides for the systematization and introduction into scientific circulation of factual material on the activities both of the «Novyi Shliakh» editorial staff and socio-political environment that influenced the information and ideological policy of the publication. Research methodology. The basis of the study is axiological, culturological, and systemic approaches; methods of historicism, analysis, synthesis, and generalization are used. Results. The period of formation and development of the editorial staff of the «Novyi Shliakh» weekly of 1930-1941 is outlined. The financial, economic, socio-political and social conditions of the beginning of the periodical’s functioning are clarified. The reasons for the low audience activity of Ukrainian settlers in Canada are identified. It is emphasized that the main merit in the process of formation of the weekly lies in the volunteer, unpaid work of the editorial team, which provided the basis for financial stability in the future. The mechanisms of expanding the readership network, attracting new authors are analyzed. It was found out that it was the efforts of the editor M. Pohoretskyi, the head of the printing house I. Solianych and the directors of the publishing house V. Hultai, I. Huliai and O. Hryhorovych that created and strengthened the material and technical base of the publishing house, conducted advertising campaigns, carried out direct work to attract new subscribers and readers. Novelty. For the first time, information on the period of formation and development of the Ukrainian-Canadian «Novyi Shliakh» weekly was analyzed and summarized. Practical significance. The results of the research can be used in the process of studying the courses «History of Ukrainian Journalism» and «History of Publishing Business» within the «Journalism» specialty. Keywords: «Novyi Shliakh», emigration, Ukrainian National Union, nationalism, editor, publisher, page, column, audience, subscription.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".