MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Transient Space Charge Limited Picosecond Pulses Using Ultra Short Laser Pulses

2021· article· en· W3211424205 on OpenAlexaff
Channprit Kaur, Karumudi Rambabu, R. Fedosejevs

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPicosecondPhotocathodeLaserOpticsElectromagnetic pulseDiodeSpace chargePhysicsTransient (computer programming)OptoelectronicsPulse (music)AnodePulse durationElectronMaterials scienceDetectorElectrode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The generation of short and powerful electron bunches and electromagnetic pulses (EMP) is a major requirement for many applications such as ultrawide band (UWB) radar sensors [1] , generation of picosecond X-ray pulses, ultra-fast electron diffraction and microscopy and as pulsed high brightness picosecond electron guns for SEM. Here we investigate a technique to generate high voltage ultra-short pulses using vacuum photo diodes for application in UWB radar sensors. The maximum current flux which can be extracted is determined by the space charge limit [2] . Here we develop a self similar analytic model for calculating the peak current and duration of the space charge limited pulses for the case of ultrashort (on the order of a picosecond or less) laser excitation of a photocathode. In order to compare to a real physical system, the pulse widths are calculated for the case of a 3 mm diode gap with various potentials ranging from 1kV to 5kV applied to the anode. In order to verify the self similar analytic solutions derived, numerical modelling of the transient pulse generation was also carried out using a 1D non-relativistic electrostatic Particle in Cell (PIC) code. The results show the possibility of generating EMP pulses of 100 ps or less in duration with peak currents of several amps leading to voltage pulses of hundreds of volts into 50 ohm loads with photocathode areas of the order of 1 cm 2 . The possibility to generate such pulses using high repetition rate (order of 10 kHz - 1 MHz) laser systems will be discussed in detail.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGyrotron and Vacuum Electronics ResearchFrench-language works237,207