Characteristics of psychic functioning among domestic violence perpetrators. Abandonment in question
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La violence conjugale est un enjeu majeur de sante publique en France. Parmi les elements entrant en ligne de compte dans l’emergence de ce type de violence, apparaissent des facteurs de risque d’ordre biologique, sociaux mais egalement psychologiques. De nombreuses etudes scientifiques, en particulier canadiennes, ont mis en evidence une preponderance d’un attachement de type insecure chez les auteurs de violences conjugales. D’un point de vue plus psychanalytique, ces individus, le plus souvent des hommes, sont souvent confrontes a une dependance affective vis-a-vis des femmes. La dynamique du passage a l’acte, declenchee par l’angoisse de perte d’objet et la confrontation au manque, intervient alors dans une tentative de reparer des blessures interieures non cicatrisees. Si l’on se situe dans cette perspective, la mise en place d’une psychotherapie individuelle axee sur cette problematique peut presenter un interet et faire partie integrante de la prise en charge de ces sujets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".