Review of Critical perspectives on education policy and schools, families, and communities
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This structure contributes to the cohesiveness of this collection while providing contributors of each chapter the opportunity to critically explore educational policy in distinct ways.While the chapters focus on contexts within Canada and the United States, there are a range of geographic contexts represented from Jefferson County, Kentucky to Vancouver, British Columbia.Just as there are a range of geographies represented, there are also a variety of policy issues (e.g., school choice, practices of segregation, unequal access to educational programs and opportunities, etc.) addressed through a range of diverse research methods (e.g., interviews, youth participatory action research, document analysis) and theories (e.g., phenomenology, critical race theory, critical disability studies).At approximately 20 pages long, each chapter is manageable and accessible.It is both the similarity in the structure of each chapter as well as the range in topics that
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it