MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3211479370 · doi:10.1101/2021.11.08.467820

scDeepHash: An automatic cell type annotation and cell retrieval method for large-scale scRNA-seq datasets using neural network-based hashing

2021· preprint· en· W3211479370 on OpenAlexaff
Shihao Ma, Yanyi Zhang, Bohao Wang, Zian Hu, Jingwei Zhang, Bo Wang

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Canadian institutionsVector InstituteUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnnotationScalabilityComputer scienceHash functionProfiling (computer programming)BenchmarkingTreebankArtificial intelligenceRNA-SeqData miningPattern recognition (psychology)TranscriptomeDatabaseGeneBiologyGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Single-cell RNA-sequencing technologies measure transcriptomic expressions, which quantifies cell-to-cell heterogeneity at an unprecedented resolution. As these technologies become more readily available, the number of scRNA-seq datasets increases drastically. Prior works have demonstrated that bias-free, holistic single-cell profiling infrastructures are essential to the emerging automatic cell-type annotation methods. We propose scDeepHash, a scalable scRNA-seq analytic tool that employs content-based deep hashing to index single-cell gene expressions. scDeepHash allows for fast and accurate automated cell-type annotation and similar-cell retrieval. We also demonstrate the performance of scDeepHash by benchmarking it against current state-of-the-art methods across multiple public scRNA-seq datasets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsFrench-language works237,207