MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3211490443 · doi:10.1101/2021.11.08.467700

TRIM24 controls induction of latent HIV-1 by stimulating transcriptional elongation

2021· preprint· en· W3211490443 on OpenAlexaff
Riley M. Horvath, Matthew S. Dahabieh, Tom Malcolm, Ivan Sadowski

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicHIV Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElongation factorP-TEFbElongationBiologyCell biologyEukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 alpha 1RNAPhosphorylationMolecular biologyGenePromoterGene expressionGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The conserved HIV-1 LTR cis elements RBE1/3 bind the factor RBF2, consisting of USF1/2 and TFII-I, and are essential for reactivation of HIV-1 by T cell signaling. We determined that TFII-I recruits the tripartite motif protein TRIM24 to the LTR, and this interaction is required for efficient reactivation of HIV-1 expression in response to T cell signaling, similar to the effect of TFII-I depletion. Knockout of TRIM24 did not affect recruitment of RNA Pol II to the LTR promoter, but inhibited transcriptional elongation, an effect that was associated with decreased RNA Pol II CTD S2 phosphorylation and impaired recruitment of CDK9 to the LTR. These results demonstrate that TFII-I promotes transcriptional elongation in response to T cell activation through recruitment of the co-factor TRIM24, which is necessary for efficient recruitment of the elongation factor P-TEFb.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicHIV Research and Treatment→French-language works237,207→