MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3211646893 · doi:10.1016/j.xgen.2021.100033

CanDIG: Federated network across Canada for multi-omic and health data discovery and analysis

2021· article· en· W3211646893 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Genomics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversitySickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenMcGill Genome CentreUniversity of WaterlooVector InstituteOntario GenomicsCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreProvidence Health CareProvincial Health Services AuthorityUniversity of British ColumbiaZymeworks (Canada)Princess Margaret Cancer CentreInstitute of Cancer ResearchOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchUniversité de SherbrookeUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenomicsData scienceAllianceBig dataKey (lock)Computer scienceWorld Wide WebGenomeData miningBiologyGeographyComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present the Canadian Distributed Infrastructure for Genomics (CanDIG) platform, which enables federated querying and analysis of human genomics and linked biomedical data. CanDIG leverages the standards and frameworks of the Global Alliance for Genomics and Health (GA4GH) and currently hosts data for five pan-Canadian projects. We describe CanDIG's key design decisions and features as a guide for other federated data systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.592
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it