MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Desarrollo de un programa de ejercicio terapéutico colaborativo, con perspectiva de género, en el grado de Fisioterapia

2021· article· es· W3211647909 on OpenAlexaff
Zeltia Naia, Olalla Bello, Lidia Carballo-Costa

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSports and Physical Education Studies
Canadian institutionsWSP (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El movimiento, como agente físico aplicado con un fin terapéutico, es la base de la Cinesiterapia. Se constituye como un pilar fundamental dentro del curriculum del grado de Fisioterapia. Dentro de la asignatura “Cinesiterapia: bases del ejercicio terapéutico”, se enseña al alumnado a realizar programas de ejercicio terapéutico basados en la evidencia científica disponible, de forma grupal e individual. Con el objetivo de motivar al alumnado, y trabajar una perspectiva de género, se propone como actividad el diseño de programas de ejercicio terapéutico de forma grupal y colaborativa. El objetivo de esta experiencia es diseñar por grupos un programa de ejercicio terapéutico y favorecer un proceso de reflexión sobre las diferencias de género en la respuesta cardiovascular. Esta dinámica mejora la motivación de los estudiantes y su participación en el proceso de aprendizaje.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.151
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.349 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSports and Physical Education StudiesFrench-language works237,207