MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3211668472 · doi:10.1002/sta4.437

A partial EM algorithm for model‐based clustering with highly diverse missing data patterns

2021· article· en· W3211668472 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStat · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBayesian Methods and Mixture Models
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMissing dataExpectation–maximization algorithmComputer scienceAlgorithmCluster analysisMixture modelConvergence (economics)ComputationDivergence (linguistics)GaussianData miningMathematicsArtificial intelligenceMachine learningStatisticsMaximum likelihood

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The expectation‐maximization (EM) algorithm for incomplete data with highly diverse missing data patterns can be computationally expensive. A partial expectation‐maximization (PEM) algorithm is developed to ease this computational burden. This PEM algorithm circumvents the need for a traditional E‐step by performing a partial E‐step that reduces the Kullback‐Leibler divergence between the conditional distribution of the missing data and the distribution of the missing data given the observed data. The PEM and EM algorithms are compared in terms of computation time and convergence on simulated data. The PEM algorithm is illustrated using a latent Gaussian mixture model to cluster a white bread sensory analysis dataset.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.996
Threshold uncertainty score0.467

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it