MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3211709983 · doi:10.3917/recma.362.0117

Les fruits tiennent-il les promesses des fleurs ? Une analyse des pratiques de microcrédit de l’UM-Pamecas au Sénégal

2021· article· fr· W3211709983 on OpenAlexaff
Ndèye Faty Sarr, Marie Fall

Bibliographic record

VenueRECMA · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicMicrofinance and Financial Inclusion
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesMicrofinanceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article s’intéresse aux impacts économiques et sociaux des microcrédits sur l’autonomisation des femmes de l’Union des mutuelles-Partenariat pour la mobilisation de l’épargne et le crédit au Sénégal (UM-Pamecas). En effet, les femmes des pays d’Afrique subsaharienne ont tenté de répondre aux conséquences des programmes d’ajustement structurel (PAS) en investissant en nombre le secteur informel. C’est dans ce contexte qu’il faut comprendre l’introduction de la microfinance dans les dispositifs de financement de l’entrepreneuriat féminin. L’analyse du mode de fonctionnement de l’UM-Pamecas montre que cette institution a délimité un champ mettant en présence des représentations, des pratiques, des stratégies et des acteurs susceptibles de l’éloigner des objectifs proclamés de la microfinance (lutte contre la pauvreté, promotion de l’égalité entre les hommes et les femmes).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.393
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRECMASame topicMicrofinance and Financial InclusionFrench-language works237,207