Point cloud data from terrestrial laser scanning for stem volume modelling of Scots pine trees
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stem volume is a key forest inventory attribute characterizing growth and yield of individual trees and forest stands. Three-dimensional information from terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) can be used to reconstruct tree stems and provide information on stem volume as well as stem shape. We collected diameter at breast height and height information with traditional field measurements as well as preprocessed TLS point cloud data on 230 Scots pine trees (Pinus sylvestris L.) from southern Finland. The data set here includes three-dimensional information on Scots pine tree stems derived from TLS point clouds. The usage of this data set can include, but is not limited to, development of point cloud processing algorithms for single tree stem reconstruction and investigations of of stem volume modelling for Scot pine. This data set includes two files: Scots_pines.txt includes DBH and height information based on field measurements from the 230 Scots pine trees. File includes the following columns: treeID, DBH, and h, where DBH is presented in cm and h (i.e. tree height) in m. Stem_points.zip, on the other hand, includes 230 laz-files where figure in the name of the laz-file refers to the tree ID in Scots_pines.txt-file. Laz-files include three columns that describe x, y, and z, coordinates (in meters) of stem points in a local coordinate system extracted from the normalized TLS point clouds (i.e. z coordinate describes height above ground).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".