MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3211744971 · doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ac4c92

Solving gauge anomaly equations in the standard model using the method of chords

2022· article· en· W3211744971 on OpenAlexaff
Dyuman Bhattacharya, Sayeh Rajabi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle Physics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiophantine equationAnomaly (physics)Gauge theoryGauge groupGauge anomalyAbelian groupGauge (firearms)PhysicsMathematicsMixed anomalyMathematical physicsHamiltonian lattice gauge theoryQuantum mechanicsPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In a recent paper, Allanach et al (2020 J. High Energy Phys. JHEP05(2020)065) introduced a geometric method to solve the anomaly cancellation equations for a U(1) gauge theory with an arbitrary number of charges—the method of chords known in Diophantine analysis. We extend their result to non-abelian gauge groups, and show that this method can be used to find the general solution to the anomaly cancellation equations for a theory with the standard model gauge group on a curved background. Given K charges in (2, 3), L charges in (2, 1), M charges in (1, 3), and N charges in (1, 1) representations of SU(2) × SU(3), the equations reduce to a homogeneous cubic Diophantine equation in K + L + M + N − 4 variables.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle PhysicsSame topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesFrench-language works237,207