MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3211754234 · doi:10.32796/bice.2021.3140.7281

Plan Integrado de Promoción de Alimentos y Vinos en el mercado canadiense

2021· article· es· W3211754234 on OpenAlex
Carlos Gómez García

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBoletín Económico de ICE · 2021
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicWine Industry and Tourism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceGeographyCartographyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Los alimentos y bebidas son uno de los rubros principales de las exportaciones españolas a Canadá y cuentan con una estrategia de apoyo bien definida por parte de la Administración comercial española. El objetivo de este artículo es presentar la estrategia que viene desarrollando ICEX en colaboración con la Oficina Económica y Comercial de España en Toronto en el mercado canadiense para impulsar las ventas del sector de la agroalimentación. Las actuaciones promocionales y de apoyo a la empresa se articulan en una estrategia integral que se ha denominado Plan Integrado de Promoción de Alimentos y Vinos. Este plan cuenta con cuatro programas que abarcan desde el inicio del proceso de acceso al mercado hasta el establecimiento de planes sectoriales por producto. Así, se pueden distinguir los siguientes programas: Programa de Acceso al Mercado, Programa de Consolidación y Expansión del Mercado, Programa de Gastronomía y Programa de Planes Sectoriales.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.380
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it