Indonesia’s Economic Growth from 2019 -2021: An Economic Overview Before and During COVID 19 Pandemic
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Almost all countries suffer from The Covid 19 pandemic which has emerged since late 2019. This pandemic has greatly impacted the nations economic growth. Indonesia is also one of many nations with high cases of COVID 19 victims which have experienced the decline of economic growth. Economic growth is also a measure of the economic performance of a nation’s community, the more productive the people in that nation than the higher the economic growth of the nation will be. Economic growth will be obtained from the increase of GDP from year to year. This study has an objective to analyze economic growth in Indonesia which happened before COVID 19 in 2019 until the year 2021 in which this pandemic has still given its economic impact on the nation. Indonesia’s economic growth in 2019 was 5.03%, in 2020 was -2.20% and in 2021 the 2nd Quarter has reached 7.07%. The research method is conducted by analyzing the Report of GDP and Economic growth released by the Central Statistics Agency (BPS). The sample of this research is the year 2019, 2020, and 2021.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".