Bibliographic record
Abstract
1.Redacte una primera aproximacion a la introduccion de la tesis que argumente el problema cientifico, el objeto de estudio, el campo de accion, la hipotesis teorica y el objetivo. a) El estilo debe ser critico, privilegiando el analisis historico logico. b) Debe prevalecer el posicionamiento cientifico del autor c) En la ideacion se tiene que hacer evidente la novedad del problema, asi como el aporte cientifico no declarado explicitamente. d) Acote la Bibliografia de acuerdo con las normas de Vancouver. e) Aunque esta aproximacion es perfectible para la tesis definitiva, confeccionela como si fuera la tesis misma. 2. Redacte una primera aproximacion al marco teorico teniendo en cuenta que debe de apuntar al objeto de estudio sin desviarse en lo mas minimo. PREPARE UN EXTRACTO DE ESTOS DOCUMENTOS PARA EL SEMINARIO. LE OFRECEMOS UN EJEMPLO
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".