Design of Granular Model: A Method Driven by Hyper-Box Iteration Granulation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recently, granular models have been highlighted in system modeling and applied to many fields since their outcomes are information granules supporting human-centric comprehension and reasoning. In this study, a design method of granular model driven by hyper-box iteration granulation is proposed. The method is composed mainly of partition of input space, formation of input hyper-box information granules with confidence levels, and granulation of output data corresponding to input hyper-box information granules. Among them, the formation of input hyper-box information granules is realized through performing the hyper-box iteration granulation algorithm governed by information granularity on input space, and the granulation of out data corresponding to input hyper-box information granules is completed by the improved principle of justifiable granularity to produce triangular fuzzy information granules. Compared with the existing granular models, the resulting one can yield the more accurate numeric and preferable granular outcomes simultaneously. Experiments completed on the synthetic and publicly available datasets demonstrate the superiority of the granular model designed by the proposed method at granular and numeric levels. Also, the impact of parameters involved in the proposed design method on the performance of ensuing granular model is explored.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it