MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3211890182 · doi:10.23977/cpcs.2021.51004

Research on Cabin Integrated Equipment Based on GIS

2021· article· en· W3211890182 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jun Liu, Kejun Yang, Daping Liu, Hui He, Tao Cheng, He Xu, Wenzhi Han

Bibliographic record

VenueComputing Performance and Communication systems · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Systems and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSwitchgearReliability (semiconductor)BusbarEngineeringElectrical equipmentReliability engineeringFlexibility (engineering)Modular designComputer sciencePower (physics)Electrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Through the research on the principle of GIS gas insulated switchgear, a GIS-based cabin integrated equipment method is proposed. The insulation characteristics and engineering calculations of SF6 gas are analyzed, which provides a basis for the selection of 220kV and 110kV equipment. Analyzed the applicability of 220kV equipment selection of HGIS equipment and GIS equipment in modular substations. At the same time, it compared the floor area and other indicators, and finally decided to adopt the GIS plan, further optimize the product structure and layout, and improve space utilization It can reduce the equipment footprint and make the layout of the power distribution device more compact. Through the comparison and analysis of the main wiring types of the 110kV single bus three section and double bus wiring, it is found that there are three aspects of reliability, flexibility and economy. Single-bus three-section is better than double-bus wiring, so 110kV is determined to adopt single-bus three-section wiring. Under the premise of meeting the requirements for power supply safety, reliability, and flexibility, 110kV electrical main wiring is optimized to achieve The purpose of simplifying operation and maintenance procedures and saving investment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputing Performance and Communication systemsSame topicPower Systems and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207