MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3211892875 · doi:10.1017/pasa.2021.59

GASKAP-HI pilot survey science I: ASKAP zoom observations of <scp>Hi</scp> emission in the Small Magellanic Cloud

2022· article· en· W3211892875 on OpenAlexaff
Nickolas M. Pingel, James Dempsey, N. M. McClure‐Griffiths, J. M. Dickey, Katherine Jameson, Héctor G. Arce, Guillem Anglada, Joss Bland‐Hawthorn, S. L. Breen, F. Buckland-Willis, Susan E. Clark, J. R. Dawson, Helga Dénes, Enrico M. Di Teodoro, Bi‐Qing For, T. Foster, José F. Gómez, Hiroshi Imai, G. Joncas, Chang‐Goo Kim, M.-Y. Lee, Callum Lynn, D. A. Leahy, Yik Ki, Antoine Marchal, D. McConnell, M.-A. Miville-Deschênes, Vanessa A. Moss, C. E. Murray, David L. Nidever, J. E. G. Peek, S. Stanimirović, L. Staveley‐Smith, Thor Tepper-García, Chenoa D. Tremblay, Lucero Uscanga, Jacco Th. van Loon, Enrique Vazquez‐Semadeni, J. R. Allison, C. S. Anderson, Lewis Ball, M. E. Bell, Douglas C.‐J. Bock, John D. Bunton, F. R. Cooray, T. J. Cornwell, B. Koribalski, N. Gupta, Douglas B. Hayman, Lisa Harvey-Smith, K. Lee-Waddell, A. Ng, Chris Phillips, M. A. Voronkov, T. Westmeier, M. T. Whiting

Bibliographic record

VenuePublications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsUniversité LavalUniversity of CalgaryBrandon University
FundersAustralian Research CouncilSwinburne University of TechnologyCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationAustralian GovernmentMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y UniversidadesScience and Industry Endowment FundGovernment of Western AustraliaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPathfinderPhysicsAstrophysicsAngular resolution (graph drawing)DeconvolutionData cubeNoise (video)Spectral resolutionSpectral densityGalaxyLarge Magellanic CloudSmall Magellanic CloudImage resolutionRange (aeronautics)Molecular cloudAstronomyRemote sensingSpectral lineOpticsComputer scienceStarsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We present the most sensitive and detailed view of the neutral hydrogen ( ${\rm H\small I}$ ) emission associated with the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC), through the combination of data from the Australian Square Kilometre Array Pathfinder (ASKAP) and Parkes (Murriyang), as part of the Galactic Australian Square Kilometre Array Pathfinder (GASKAP) pilot survey. These GASKAP-HI pilot observations, for the first time, reveal ${\rm H\small I}$ in the SMC on similar physical scales as other important tracers of the interstellar medium, such as molecular gas and dust. The resultant image cube possesses an rms noise level of 1.1 K ( $1.6\,\mathrm{mJy\ beam}^{-1}$ ) $\mathrm{per}\ 0.98\,\mathrm{km\ s}^{-1}$ spectral channel with an angular resolution of $30^{\prime\prime}$ ( ${\sim}10\,\mathrm{pc}$ ). We discuss the calibration scheme and the custom imaging pipeline that utilises a joint deconvolution approach, efficiently distributed across a computing cluster, to accurately recover the emission extending across the entire ${\sim}25\,\mathrm{deg}^2$ field-of-view. We provide an overview of the data products and characterise several aspects including the noise properties as a function of angular resolution and the represented spatial scales by deriving the global transfer function over the full spectral range. A preliminary spatial power spectrum analysis on individual spectral channels reveals that the power law nature of the density distribution extends down to scales of 10 pc. We highlight the scientific potential of these data by comparing the properties of an outflowing high-velocity cloud with previous ASKAP+Parkes ${\rm H\small I}$ test observations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.410

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePublications of the Astronomical Society of AustraliaSame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207