TOMORROW’S OLDER PEOPLE: SOCIO-ECONOMIC ASPECTS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’etude des generations actuellement dans la seconde moitie de leur vie adulte annoncent les changements a venir dans les caracteristiques des personnes âgees. Cinq aspects des conditions de vie sont abordes: l’education, la participation au marche du travail, le revenu, la preparation financiere a la retraite et la consommation. Parmi les tendances favorables aux conditions de vie des personnes âgees de demain, observees a la fois au Quebec et en France, on note la hausse du niveau d’education, la progression de la participation des femmes sur le marche du travail et l’amelioration du revenu. Les revenus ont progresse davantage chez les personnes âgees que chez les autres groupes d’âge; l’ecart entre retraites et actifs a ete plus reduit en France. Il est a prevoir que les modifications aux regimes de retraite et aux programmes publics, adoptees dans les dernieres annees, ou envisagees, auront des effets a long terme sur le revenu des retraites et sur l’âge de la retraite.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".