El empacho: una significativa enfermedad popular en el Caribe
Bibliographic record
Abstract
«Empacho» is one of the most recognized culture-bound syndromes both in Latin America and among Latino migrants in the United States and Canada. In this paper a summary showing the results of the review of old and contemporary documentation that accounts for the validity and persistence of this popular disease is presented. 133 texts coming from public and private libraries in Cuba, Colombia, Puerto Rico, the Dominican Republic, Trinidad and Tobago and Venezuela, among other countries were reviewed. The information so found covers some contributions supporting a definition as well as a description of the symptoms of the disease and an epidemiological approach. Some recommendations intended to prevent and manage it have also been identified together with treatments involving medicinal plants, massages, religious remedies, special domestic maneuvers inherited from one generation to the next, homeopathic and patent medicines. The review revealed descriptions of treatments combining two or more techniques and even the existence of some specialists who can perform remote treatments. The article concludes that there must be an approach in the intercultural field to understand and overcome the tension between popular knowledge (contained in traditional medicine) and scientific knowledge, since empacho has been little recognized and valued by the academic medicine
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".