Budaya Organisasi, Komitmen Organisasi, dan Kompensasi Pengaruhnya Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Kantor Balai Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Penerbangan Jayapura
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tesis ini meneliti meneiliti pengaruh Budaya Organisasi terhadap Kinerja Pegawai, pengaruh Komitmen Organisasi terhadap Kinerja Pegawai, pengaruh Kompensasi terhadap Kinerja Pegawai, dan pengaruh Budaya Organisasi, Komitmen Organisasi, dan Kompensasi secara simultan terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Kantor Balai Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Penerbangan Jayapura. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh pegawai Kantor Balai Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Penerbangan Jayapura baik tenaga lapangan maupun tenaga administrasi, yakni sebanyak 89 orang pegawai. Jumlah sampel sebanyak 89 orang pegawai juga sebagai sampel penelitian ini. Temuan membuktikan bahwa 1). Budaya organisasi berpengaruh Positif terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Kantor Balai Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Penerbangan Jayapura, 2. Komitmen organisasi berpengaruh Positif terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Kantor Balai Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Penerbangan Jayapura, 3). Kompensasi berpengaruh Positif terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Kantor Balai Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Penerbangan Jayapura. 4). Budaya Organisasi, Komitmen Organisasi dan Kompensasi secara simultan berpengaruh terhadap Sumber Daya Manusia Pegawai Kantor Balai Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Penerbangan Jayapura. Kata Kunci: Budaya Organisasi, Komitmen Organisasi, Konpensasi, Kinerja Personil.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it