Stochastic Expectation Propagation Learning of Infinite Multivariate Beta Mixture Models for Human Tissue Analysis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nowadays, there is considerable and growing interest in applying accurate analysis tools to obtain meaningful information and extract knowledge from a huge amount of data. In this sense, unsupervised algorithms and clustering techniques have gained an increasing interest. These methods are helpful specifically when data annotation is time-consuming and costly. In this paper, we propose a new clustering method based on a Dirichlet process mixture of multivariate Beta distributions. To learn this novel Bayesian nonparametric model, we applied stochastic expectation propagation inference framework. This framework is able to define the model complexity and estimate the model’s parameters simultaneously. To demonstrate the efficiency of our model, we perform an experimental analysis using three real applications, breast, lung and colon histopathological tissue analysis. Our goal is to show that our algorithm could be considered as a machine learning framework in computer-assisted diagnosis and play the role of a complementary opinion to help the pathologists in making decisions with more accuracy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it