MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Model Predictive Control of HVAC System in a Battery Electric Vehicle with Fan Power Adaptation for Improved Efficiency and Online Estimation of Ambient Temperature

2021· article· en· W3211970873 on OpenAlexaff
Maryam Alizadeh, Sumedh Dhale, Ali Emadi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHVACAutomotive engineeringAir conditioningModel predictive controlComputer scienceLookup tableBattery (electricity)Temperature controlEnergy consumptionPower (physics)SimulationEngineeringControl engineeringElectrical engineeringControl (management)Mechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces an improved real-time Model Predictive Climate Control (MPCC) technique to reduce power consumption in Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) system of the Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs). In the presented control technique, the fan, heating and cooling power usage is optimized considering the effect of the ambient temperature. Moreover, the need of a physical temperature measurement sensor is eliminated using an ambient temperature observer. In a typical BEV, the HVAC load is significant and it influences the overall vehicle performance and driving range. Therefore, a real-time control system capable of maintaining desired cabin temperature while achieving maximum HVAC efficiency is highly desirable. In the proposed MPCC, the optimum split of the battery power between the heating\cooling and the fan power is identified as a function of ambient temperature through an offline optimization process and used in the form of a lookup-table for real-time implementation. It is demonstrated that the proposed MPCC improves energy consumption efficiency of the entire HVAC system up to 5% by dynamically adapting to the variations in the ambient temperature. Furthermore, owing to the online temperature observation process, the proposed HVAC control system allows elimination of ambient temperature sensor and corresponding maintenance efforts. In this paper, the performance of the proposed MPCC is evaluated over a single-zone HVAC model of a BEV in MATLAB\Simulink <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">®</sup> environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.362
Threshold uncertainty score0.296

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectric and Hybrid Vehicle TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207