MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3211984266 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2021.3125674

PIPC: Privacy- and Integrity-Preserving Clustering Analysis for Load Profiling in Smart Grids

2021· article· en· W3211984266 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInternet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesSichuan Province Science and Technology Support ProgramNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCluster analysisProfiling (computer programming)Computer scienceNotationData miningEncryptionAlgorithmMathematicsComputer securityArtificial intelligenceProgramming languageArithmetic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Generally, power utilities can utilize smart-meter data to extract load patterns through load-profiling technologies, such as <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$K$ </tex-math></inline-formula> -means clustering. To improve the efficiency of load profiling, both <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$K$ </tex-math></inline-formula> -means clustering and smart-meter data can be outsourced to powerful clouds. However, clouds are not completely trustworthy: private meter data may be used for commercial interests; <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$K$ </tex-math></inline-formula> -means clustering may also be performed with fewer iterations to save computational costs, which violates the integrity of outsourced clustering. In this article, therefore, a secure <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$K$ </tex-math></inline-formula> -means-clustering scheme is proposed, called privacy-preserving and integrity-preserving clustering (PIPC), which aims to protect the privacy and integrity of load profiling. To this end, two techniques are designed: 1) encrypted distance measurement, in which a public comparison matrix is constructed by securely embedding a secret key matrix and 2) integrity assurance, in which a specific Stackelberg game is designed to create economic incentives. The former, as the core of <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$K$ </tex-math></inline-formula> -means clustering, can protect the privacy of meter data. The latter ensures that clouds can obtain the maximum utility only when clouds execute <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$K$ </tex-math></inline-formula> -means clustering in an honest manner, thereby preserving the integrity of outsourced computing. Experimental results demonstrate that PIPC reaches high clustering accuracy and computational efficiency for load profiling while retaining smart-meter data privacy and outsourced-clustering integrity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.801
Threshold uncertainty score0.808

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it