An Investigation Into the Characteristics of a “2D” Flow Control Valve
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In hydraulic servo systems, a pilot stage is often used to reduce the influence of Bernoulli’s forces and frictional forces when trying to accurately position a spool. A unique pilot controlled valve, (defined as a “2D” flow control valve), which utilizes both rotary and linear motions of a single spool, is presented. The rotary motion uses a spiral groove in the sleeve combined with high and low pressure holes on the spool land to control the pressure in the spool chamber, while the linear motion of the spool is actuated by a hydrostatic force. Both linear theory and numerical simulation are adopted in the investigation of the characteristics of the valve. A criterion for stability is established from a linearized model of the valve. The analysis establishes the effects that certain structural parameters have on the valve’s static and dynamic characteristics. Special experimental procedures were designed to obtain properties such as mechanical stiffness, leakage flow rate, and dynamic response under different structural parameters and system pressure. It was shown that the leakage through the spool-sleeve clearance had a favorable effect on the valve stability. Theoretical and experimental results show that it is necessary to establish a balance between the static and dynamic performance in establishing appropriate structural parameters. It is also shown that the 2D flow control valve can demonstrate a high speed of response, while maintaining the pilot flow rate at a low level.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".