MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3212053395 · doi:10.1002/lpor.202100032

Dependence of the Efficiency of the Nonlinear‐Optical Response of Materials on their Linear Permittivity and Permeability

2021· article· en· W3212053395 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLaser & Photonics Review · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNonlinear Optical Materials Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersArmy Research Office
KeywordsPermittivityNonlinear systemMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsNonlinear opticsCondensed matter physicsEnergy conversion efficiencyElectronPhysicsOpticsComputational physicsDielectricQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The dependence of the efficiency of various nonlinear‐optical processes on the background linear relative electric permittivity ϵ and magnetic permeability μ of the material is analytically and numerically investigated. The conversion efficiency of low‐order harmonic‐generation processes, as well as the increase rate of Kerr‐effect nonlinear phase shift and nonlinear losses from two‐photon absorption (TPA), are seen to increase with decreasing ϵ and/or increasing μ. The rationale and physical insights behind this nonlinear response are also discussed, particularly its enhancement in ϵ‐near‐zero (ENZ) media. This behavior is consistent with the experimental observation of intriguingly high effective nonlinear refractive indices in degenerate semiconductors such as indium tin oxide and aluminum oxide (where the nonlinearity is attributed to a modification of the energy distribution of conduction‐band electrons due to laser‐induced electron heating) at frequencies with vanishing real part of the linear permittivity. Such strong nonlinear response can pave the way for a new paradigm in nonlinear optics with much higher conversion efficiencies and therefore better miniaturization capabilities and power requirements for next‐generation integrated nanophotonics. It is concluded that the major contribution to the enhanced nonlinear response of ENZ materials arises from propagation effects, that is, the appearance of ϵ and μ in the reduced wave equation describing the interaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.383

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it