MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3212070088 · doi:10.1182/blood-2021-152762

The Monocyte Monolayer Assay to Build a Personalized Pipeline of Transfusion Support in Highly Sensitized Sickle Cell Disease

2021· article· en· W3212070088 on OpenAlexaff
Shangari Vijenthira, Jenny Thuy Tien Nguyen, Donald R. Branch, Gwen Clarke, Richard Ward, Samia Saeed, Christine Cserti‐Gazdewich

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood groups and transfusion
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalCanadian Blood ServicesUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAntigenSeroconversionImmunologyAntibodyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND: RBC transfusions play a role in organ- and life-preservation for patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). These in turn are subject to higher-fidelity matches to offset the particularly high condition-specific odds of seroconversion events. Adverse outcomes may be as severe as hyperhemolysis, and/or undertransfusion from the scarcity of suitable antigen profiles. In a woman with HbSS SCD and multiple alloantibodies (-K, -E, Jkb-, -Fya, -S), correspondingly antigen-negative units had nevertheless become invariably crossmatch-incompatible (iXM) owing to the development of an antibody to -Kna, a high-prevalence (but clinically insignificant) target antigen on CR1/CD35. Genotyping ruled out the absence of other rare antigen-negative states at risk of high-frequency antibodies (hrB, hrS, Joa, U). Due to uncertainties on the in-vivo effects of iXM RBC in this patient, the infeasibility of sourcing of complete antigen matches, and challenges ruling out other emerging (and potentially more harmful) antibodies, a prolonged period of transfusion-avoidance ensued. This deferral correlated with progression of SCD-associated dilated non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and restrictive interstitial pulmonary fibrosis. In order to qualify Kna-unselected iXM that were otherwise target-negative for her clinically significant antibodies, a monocyte monolayer assay (MMA) approach was taken to identify, transfuse, and maintain a personalized roster of RBCs for monthly top-up transfusions. METHODS: Selected donors (group O, ±D, ±C, E- K- Jkb- Fya-) were assessed at least once in the MMA by a 4:1 (patient serum) to (candidate unit RBC) ratio, incubated at 37°C for 1 hour. The total number of RBCs phagocytosed in 100 patient monocytes was reported as a phagocytic index (PI), with a significance cut-off of 5 (or lower, if rosettes were noted, and/or a noticeably more incompatible [≥3+] crossmatch was observed compared with other prepared units). Antibody screens (automated solid phase) and manual serologic crossmatches (by both conventional tube- and gel microtube- technique) were performed at each RBC sitting. Interval/pre-RBC tests incorporated hemolytic markers and hemoglobin electrophoresis (HbS%). RESULTS: Of 26 donors examined in 8 MMA arrays over 3 years, 10 were excluded due to high PI (median 6 [range 3.3-54]) and/or differential iXM. Of the remaining 16 (PI 0.9 [0.2-4.5]), RBCs have been transfused from 13, with 56 units [u] (51 fresh/5 frozen-deglycerolized) given in 27 sittings over 113 weeks. Most have donated >1u (7/13 with ≥1u transfused to this recipient, median 4u [range 1-8]). The HbS% fell from 91% to 45% [39-48] (median [IQR], pre-3rd-to-27th sitting) with improved hemolytic markers and freedom from overt incompatibility reactions. A minor allergic reaction on the 1 st sitting (with 2u from the same donor) led to a default mitigation strategy of supernatant reduction and antihistamine-premedication thereafter. All sittings (including 5u from the index donor) were reaction-free until a 2 nd minor allergic reaction 2 years later (associated with 2 other donors). Improvements occurred in cardiac function, performance status, pain, and quality of life over the 1 st 20 months of transfusions, though an acute pulmonary embolism and progressive iron overload have reversed the initial gains. Of 11 donors re-examined in 3 repeat MMA (29-112 weeks later), 10 were re-qualified; the 1 st donor was excluded due to an unexplained PI surge (2.5 to 5.6). Host tolerance otherwise increased to most re-qualified donors in a PI downtrend over time (in 8/10, median 1 st PI 2.1, vs median 2 nd PI 1.0, P=0.006 [paired, 2-sided t-test]). A new sensitization (anti-Cob) was noted before the 14 th sitting, with donor genotypes imputing and disqualifying donor 9. CONCLUSIONS: An MMA-vetted pipeline of RBCs in a once-prohibitively alloimmunized patient with SCD has re-enabled transfusion care by the coordinated efforts of the national blood collector with its donors, its MMA laboratory, and the supervising hospital transfusion service. An unexpected finding in repeated exposures to a limited number of donors was increased tolerance. When the viability of transfusions is restored in SCD, so too are opportunities in disease control and in transfusion-requiring curative treatment options. The number of similarly constrained patients, and the scalability of this innovation, remain to be determined. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.576

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicBlood groups and transfusionFrench-language works237,207