Bibliographic record
Abstract
V363 Cassiopeiae was observed through 51 acquisitions of each of V, B, i and z filters, during a 15 day observation window. From the observations, folded light curves were generated using a PDM technique. It was my objective to provide further evidence for this star’s reclassification as a first overtone Anomalous Cepheid, as some past papers have proposed (Fernley, 1998). Based on our light curve characteristics (shape, and period), V363 Cas appeared to favor the anomalous Cepheid class over any RR Lyrae class. My observed period of 0.545 days is higher than the typical range of periods for RRd Lyrae, reported between 0.25 and 0.49 days (Soszynski et al., 2008). The RRab type Lyrae, as some have imposed on V363 Cas (Kholopov et al., 1985), was ruled out due to the evidence for overtone pulsation by Hajdu et al. (Hajdu, Jurcsik, et al., 2009) and Fernley (Fernley, 1998). Finally, a rough distance comparison to GAIA, using Nemec’s 1994 P-L-[Fe/H] for Anomalous Cepheids (Nemec, Nemec, & Lutz, 1994), estimated the distance of V363 Cas to be closer to the distance estimated by GAIA than estimates made with RRd class equations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".