MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3212109522 · doi:10.5802/crmath.408

Prefixes of the Fibonacci word that end with a cube

2023· article· en· W3212109522 on OpenAlex
Narad Rampersad

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueComptes Rendus Mathématique · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
Topicsemigroups and automata theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Winnipeg
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsFibonacci numberPrefixWord (group theory)MathematicsCube (algebra)CombinatoricsArithmeticPisano periodFibonacci polynomialsDiscrete mathematicsGeometryLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Fibonacci word <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="bold">f</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>010010100100101</mml:mn> <mml:mo>⋯</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> is one of the most well-studied words in the area of combinatorics on words. It is not periodic, but nevertheless contains many highly periodic factors (contiguous subwords). For example, it contains many cubes (i.e., non-empty words of the form <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>x</mml:mi> <mml:mi>x</mml:mi> <mml:mi>x</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ). We study the prefixes of the Fibonacci word that end with a cube. Using the computer prover Walnut, we obtain an exact description of the positions of the Fibonacci word at which a cube ends. This gives a certain measure of how close the Fibonacci word is to being periodic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.552
Threshold uncertainty score0.408

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it