MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3212136531

Relatório de estágio curricular supervisionado em medicina veterinária – área: clínica médica de pequenos animais

2018· article· pt· W3212136531 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Felipe Forgiarini Rabello

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldHealth Professions
TopicVeterinary Practice and Education Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O Estagio Curricular Supervisionado em Medicina Veterinaria (ECSMV) e constituinte obrigatorio para graduacao em Medicina Veterinaria, sendo o foco deste a Clinica Medica de Pequenos Animais. No presente relatorio estao descritas as atividades realizadas no periodo de quinze de janeiro a seis de abril de 2018 totalizando 456 horas, acompanhando o Medico Veterinario Rodrigo Giordani Ritt atuante na cidade de Santa Rosa-RS sob orientacao institucional da Profa. Dra. Mauren Picada Emanuelli. As atividades realizadas foram relacionadas a participacao e acompanhamento de 122 atendimentos, sendo 108 caninos e 14 felinos, com as enfermidades do sistema tegumentar possuindo maior incidencia. Foram executados e/ou acompanhados 502 procedimentos, entre eles coletas de sangue, vacinacao e vermifugacao. O ECSMV serviu como forma de colocar em pratica o conhecimento adquirido ao decorrer da vida academica, alem de proporcionar outros aprendizados necessarios e imprescindiveis a insercao no mercado de trabalho. A seguir serao relatados a rotina clinica vivenciada, alem de dois casos clinicos, um de displasia coxofemoral em um Labrador Retriver e um caso clinico de uma cadela Sem Raca Definida com cisto folicular ovariano.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.100

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.231
GPT teacher head0.496
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVeterinary Practice and Education StudiesFrench-language works237,207