MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3212164508

A Course-Based Qualitative Inquiry into the Lived Educational Experience of Child and Youth Care in Becoming More Authentic

2021· article· en· W3212164508 on OpenAlexaff
Elana Beaver

Bibliographic record

VenueStudent Research Proceedings · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiverse Education Studies and Reforms
Canadian institutionsMacEwan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumilityPerspective (graphical)ForgivenessLife course approachFoundation (evidence)Lived experienceQualitative researchPsychologySociologyPedagogySocial psychologyPsychoanalysisSocial scienceComputer sciencePhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The basic contention of the relational-centred philosophical foundation of CYC practice is that being “authentic” runs much deeper than the notion to “just be yourself”. Being oneself can mean that a self-centred, uncaring person can be authentic by being true to their self-centeredness, which is not the case. From a relational-centred CYC perspective, authenticity is a life‐long process of self‐discovery, humility, and in some instances healing and forgiveness potential. Department: Child and Youth Care Faculty Mentor: Dr. Gerard Bellefeuille

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.012
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.184
GPT teacher head0.535
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudent Research ProceedingsSame topicDiverse Education Studies and ReformsFrench-language works237,207