MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3212214242 · doi:10.1002/essoar.10507289.1

Analysis of local dust plumes using ground- and satellite-based remote sensing supported by surface measurements

2021· article· en· W3212214242 on OpenAlexaffabout
Seyed Ali Sayedain, Norman T. O’Neill, James King, P. Hayes

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric aerosols and clouds
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSatelliteRemote sensingMeteorologyGeographyPhysicsAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Kluane Lake region in the Canadian Yukon territory is subject to regular drainage-flow dust plumes emanating from the Slims River basin. We have recently employed ground- and satellite-based remote sensing (RS) techniques to analyze the complementarity and redundancy of such RS retrievals relative to springtime Kluane Lake measurements made using a suite of microphysical and meteorological instruments. Our preliminary results include a correlation analysis between ground- and satellite-based CM (coarse or super-μm mode) AOD (aerosol optical depth) retrievals and between ground-based CM AODs and their surface microphysical analogues of particle-volume concentration, supported by 1.5 μm Doppler (HSRL) lidar profiles. The analysis includes an opto-physical interpretation of strongly and weakly correlative illustrations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.380
Threshold uncertainty score0.755

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAtmospheric aerosols and clouds→French-language works237,207→