MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3212245162 · doi:10.1137/20m1378065

Dynamics of a Diffusive Nutrient-Phytoplankton-Zooplankton Model with Spatio-temporal Delay

2021· article· en· W3212245162 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Yiwen Tao, Sue Ann Campbell, Francis Poulin

Bibliographic record

VenueSIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaChina Scholarship CouncilUniversity of Waterloo
KeywordsZooplanktonPhytoplanktonDynamics (music)NutrientEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceStability (learning theory)DiffusionOceanographyEcologySociologyGeologyBiologyPhysicsMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study a diffusive nutrient-phytoplankton-zooplankton (NPZ) model with spatio-temporal delay. The closed nature of the system allows the formulation of a conservation law of biomass that governs the ecosystem. We advance the understanding of the local stability for equilibrium solutions of the NPZ model by proposing a new local stability theorem for generalized three-dimensional systems. Using a specific delay kernel, we perform a qualitative analysis of the solutions, including existence, uniqueness, and boundedness of the solutions, global stability of the trivial equilibrium, and Hopf bifurcation of the nontrivial equilibrium. Numerical simulations are also performed to verify and supplement our analytical results. We show that diffusion predominantly has a stabilizing effect; however, if sufficient nutrient is present, complex spatio-temporal dynamics may occur.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.085

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSIAM Journal on Applied MathematicsSame topicMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology ModelsFrench-language works237,207