МОНЕТНЫЕ НАХОДКИ ИЗ «БАШЕН» НА ПОСТМИТРИДАТОВСКОЙ ХОРЕ ЕВРОПЕЙСКОГО БОСПОРА
Bibliographic record
Abstract
При раскопках башнеобразных построек на границах дальней хоры Европейского Боспора, и прежде всего близ Узунларского вала, в разные годы было найдено до полусотни монет, поддающихся определению. Большей частью это монеты, чеканенные в Пантикапее во второй четверти – середине I в. до н. э. (Митридат, Фарнак, Махар), затем идут монеты первых лет правления Асандра. Единичные экземпляры датируются III и концом II вв. до н. э., а также концом I в. до н. э. – I в. н. э. В целом они характеризуют особенности монетного дела и денежного обращения на пространствах сельской территории этой части Боспорского государства в период существования данных укреплений, который, согласно письменным источникам и археологическим находкам, был очень коротким: между 47 и 9 гг. до н. э. In the course of excavations of tower-looking constructions around fifty identifiable coins were found, in various years, at the borders of the faraway Chora in the European part of the Bosporan Kingdom, most notably, near the Uzunlar rampart. Mostly, these are coins minted in Panticapaeum in the second quarter–the middle of the 1st century BC (Mithradates, Pharnaces, Mahar) and coins minted in the first years of Asandr’s ruling. Singular coins are dated to the 3rd century BC and the end of the 2nd century BC as well as the end of the 1st century BC – 1st century AD. Basically, they characterize distinctive features of the mintage and money in circulation in rural areas in this part of the Bosporan Kingdom during the period when these fortifications were in use, which, as demonstrated in written sources and by archaeological finds, was very short, i. e. between 47 and 9 BC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".