MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Robust Self-Commissioning Technique for Identification of the VSI Nonlinearity Effect in IPMSM Drives

2021· article· en· W3212286909 on OpenAlexafffund
Sumedh Dhale, Babak Nahid‐Mobarakeh, Ali Emadi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)InductanceNonlinear systemInverterNoise (video)TorqueConstant (computer programming)Convergence (economics)Computer scienceVoltageEngineeringPhysicsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a novel self-commissioning procedure for the identification of inverter nonlinearity constant comprised of the average voltage drops on switches and diodes in conduction state and switching delays. Simultaneous estimation of phase resistance, d-axis synchronous inductance, and inverter nonlinearity constant is achieved at standstill condition by injecting sinusoidal d-axis current. The advantages of the proposed self-commissioning method are twofold: 1) The co-estimation capability provides insensitivity towards errors in resistance and d-axis inductance. 2) While sinusoidal d-axis current is injected, the q-axis current is actively maintained at 0A. Thus, no torque is generated during the self-commissioning period. The effect of discontinuous distortions due to non-ideal switching as well as current sensor noise is rejected by limiting the estimation period within a feasible estimation window. Thereby, a necessary minimum phase current magnitude is established for achieving accurate estimation. This paper also provides parameter convergence analysis and the existence of unique solutions during proposed self-commissioning process, further justifying the choice of proposed feasible estimation region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.809
Threshold uncertainty score0.217

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207