MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3212307695 · doi:10.1684/epd.2021.1370

Flashing lights and epileptic spasms: should we be routinely performing intermittent photic stimulation in infants?

2022· article· en· W3212307695 on OpenAlexaff
Marvin H. Braun, Naureen Jooma, Morris H. Scantlebury

Bibliographic record

VenueEpileptic Disorders · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotic StimulationEpilepsyMedicineStimulationElectroencephalographyEpileptic spasmsPediatricsNeuroscienceAnesthesiaPsychologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abnormal cortical excitation in response to photic stimulation (photosensitivity) has historically been associated with generalized epilepsies, in patients outside of infancy. At our tertiary centre, we encountered a patient with infantile spasms secondary to a mutation in ALG13 (c320A>G) who had photic stimulation-induced epileptic spasms over a broad range of frequencies on multiple EEGs, which were worse without treatment and decreased as treatment was escalated. This is the first reported case of epileptic spasms triggered by photic stimulation and it is unclear whether the phenomenon is unique to this patient, to those with this mutation or whether it is present in a broader group of patients with infantile spasms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.139
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEpileptic DisordersSame topicEpilepsy research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207