MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3212336610 · doi:10.1080/10106049.2021.1974955

Assessment of the benefit of a single sentinel-2 satellite image to small crop parcels mapping

2021· article· en· W3212336610 on OpenAlexaff
Jaouad El Hachimi, Abderrazak El Harti, Jamal-Eddine Ouzemou, Rachid Lhissou, Mohcine Chakouri, Amine Jellouli

Bibliographic record

VenueGeocarto International · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing in Agriculture
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCohen's kappaCropImage resolutionRemote sensingSatellite imageVegetation (pathology)Data setImage (mathematics)Focus (optics)SatelliteSet (abstract data type)GeographyMathematicsComputer scienceCartographyPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceStatisticsForestryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present study demonstrates the feasibility of producing crop type maps using a single high spatial resolution image from Sentinel-2A (S-2A). Our main objectives focus on the evaluation of the potential of S-2A data for crop mapping in the Tadla Plain and the determination of the most suitable period for discriminating different crops using a single S-2A image. In order to achieve these objectives, we have acquired a set of seven images of the S-2A and twelve vegetation indices. Then, we produced crop type maps at a spatial resolution of 10 m using (SVM) and (RF) classifiers for each image. The accuracy and performance of classification were assessed using field data. The optimal period for mapping was done during March with an overall accuracy and kappa coefficient of 91.49%, 0.90 respectively. The results show that a single S-2A image should be sufficient for the discrimination of different crops.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.797
Threshold uncertainty score0.691

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeocarto InternationalSame topicRemote Sensing in AgricultureFrench-language works237,207