Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Investigar sobre el conflicto tiene hoy su actualidad y valor propio indiscutiblemente en y para diversas ciencias humanas. Sin embargo, no ocurre lo mismo en la filosofia porque no solo no se ha plantea-do el conflicto como una cuestion filosofica, sino que, sobre todo, tampoco se le ha pensado en su mutua pertenencia con la “cuestion” filosofica. Empezar a hacerlo es el objetivo del presente trabajo. Considerando que la ontologia heideggeriana puede enmarcar nuestros esfuerzos, acudimos a la diferencia ontologica como pasarela que nos permite justificar nuestra apuesta de desmontar la comprension ontica y barruntar una comprension ontologica del conflicto. En primer lugar, nos referiremos a algunos de los desarrollos teoricos mas actuales sobre el conflicto. Seguidamente, dilucidaremos los rasgos fundamentales de la diferencia ontologica. Luego, recabaremos en algunos fragmentos de Anaximandro, Heraclito y Parmenides sus planteamientos ontologicos sobre el conflicto. Por ultimo, formularemos algunas conclusiones.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.052 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it