Symbolique et destinée des « archives figurées » Robert-Lionel Séguin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Louis Edmond-Hamelin est dans le dernier droit de son rectorat à l’Uqtr quand il prononce cette allocution, le 13 juin 1983, à l’occasion de l’acquisition de la collection Robert-Lionel Séguin par son université. Plus qu’un simple discours de circonstance, ce texte prend vite les allures d’un manifeste en faveur d’une approche interdisciplinaire du champ des « Études québécoises ». Grâce à l’immense valeur documentaire du fonds Séguin, le plus grand trésor de culture matérielle du Québec, ce sont en effet trois siècles de culture francophonienne qui pourront être approfondis. Cet exposé s’avère en même temps un programme de développement intellectuel de cette collection monumentale qui touche le catalogage, l’enseignement au premier cycle, la recherche et les études postérieures, la pédagogie muséologique et la collaboration interinstitutionnelle. Ce texte fait l’objet d’une présentation contextuelle et d’un appareil de notes qui en situent la portée institutionnelle novatrice et originale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".