Thermodynamically study of phase formation of Ni-Ti-Si nanocomposites produced by self-propagating high-temperature synthesis method
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Understanding the phase formation mechanisms in self-propagating high-temperature synthesis from the thermodynamical aspect of view is important. In this study, the phase formation of the ternary system of nickel-titanium-silicon was studied by using the HSC software V6.0, and phase formation is predicted by calculating the adiabatic temperature of exothermic reaction between reagents. Then, by using X-ray diffractometer analysis, the results of the simulation were evaluated by experimental achievements. Results showed a good correlation between thermodynamical calculation and prediction with experimental. It could be concluded that the equilibrium mechanism is the dominant mechanism in phase formation in the SHS synthesis method. NiTiSi solid solution phase is obtained from the reaction between Ti5Si3 and Ni2Si and Ni.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it