MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3212464241 · doi:10.53612/recisatec.v1i4.39

ALTA PRODUTIVIDADE E A RELAÇÃO COM A SÍNDROME DE BURNOUT

2021· article· pt· W3212464241 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRECISATEC - REVISTA CIENTÍFICA SAÚDE E TECNOLOGIA - ISSN 2763-8405 · 2021
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOccupational Health and Burnout
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)Canadian Association of Nurses in OncologyMinistère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité Sociale (Québec)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesBurnoutPsychologyBurn outPhilosophyClinical psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Síndrome de Burnout ou síndrome do esgotamento profissional, é caracterizada pelo excesso crônico de estresse ocupacional que leva ao cansaço emocional e físico, influenciando na redução da capacidade do indivíduo. A alta produtividade no trabalho é algo comum nos dias de hoje, as pessoas querem produzir mais, de maneira rápida, sabendo administrar melhor o seu tempo de modo que não se cansem muito e sejam práticos. O objetivo do estudo é compreender a diferença entre um indivíduo produtivo e aquele com a síndrome de Burnout, a partir da revisão de literatura, realizada por meio das seguintes bases de dados: SciELO, PubMed PsycINFO e Science Direct.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.353
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it