MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3212472262 · doi:10.1080/00295450.2021.1913033

Canadian Contributions to the Manhattan Project and Early Nuclear Research

2021· article· en· W3212472262 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stephen A. Andrews, Madison Andrews, T. E. Mason

Bibliographic record

VenueNuclear Technology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTwentieth Century Scientific Developments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsManhattan projectUraniumResearch reactorPolitical scienceEnriched uraniumNuclear weaponEnvironmental sciencePublic administrationNuclear physicsPhysicsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the Second World War, Canada made several important contributions to wartime nuclear research efforts. The three main contributions were: establishing a domestic nuclear research laboratory in Montreal to investigate heavy water reactor; creating supply chains to provide uranium oxide, heavy water, and polonium to the Manhattan Project; and the direct contributions of several Canadians living in the United States to the project. These wartime efforts helped establish a legacy of nuclear research in Canada that has persisted to the present day.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.972
Threshold uncertainty score0.946

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.007
Science and technology studies0.0280.007
Scholarly communication0.0090.002
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNuclear TechnologySame topicTwentieth Century Scientific DevelopmentsFrench-language works237,207