MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3212518151 · doi:10.1109/jsen.2021.3127136

Design of a High-Power Gaussian Pulse Transmitter for Sensing and Imaging of Buried Objects

2021· article· en· W3212518151 on OpenAlexafffund
Rouhollah Feghhi, Fatemeh Modares Sabzevari, Adil Karimov, Masum Hossain, Karumudi Rambabu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Sensors Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysical Methods and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTransmitterVivaldi antennaBalunAntenna (radio)Computer scienceMonopulse radarElectronic engineeringRingingElectrical engineeringPhysicsEngineeringRadarTelecommunicationsRadiation patternRadar imagingPulse-Doppler radar

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper aims to investigate a high-power and low-cost monopulse transmitter circuit for underground and underwater sensing and imaging. The transmitter utilizes two Marx transistor-based pulse generators, a balun, and a Vivaldi antenna. A simple output network, including an inductor and Schottky diode, is employed to compensate for the ringing level and distortion and improve the pulse width. The ringing level of the developed circuit is around 6 percent. The output is a Gaussian pulse with pulse width and amplitude of 481 ps and 50 V, respectively. In order to have a high amplitude monopulse, an exact replica of this network in parallel is exploited. The outputs of the parallel circuits are subtracted through the balun to have adc-free monopulse with amplitude and pulse width of 26 V and 483 ps, respectively. The monopulse is radiated by a Vivaldi antenna toward a buried object. The image of the target is generated using the time-domain global back projection (TD-GBP) method. Three imaging experiments are conducted to verify the functionality of the designed sensor system. The reconstructed images and the reference images are shown high structural similarity indexes of 98.6%, 95.4%, and 97.6%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Sensors JournalSame topicGeophysical Methods and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207