SPME-LC/MS-based serum metabolomic phenotyping for distinguishing ovarian cancer histologic subtypes: a pilot study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the most common cause of death from gynecological cancer. The outcomes of EOC are complicated, as it is often diagnosed late and comprises several heterogenous subtypes. As such, upfront treatment can be highly challenging. Although many significant advances in EOC management have been made over the past several decades, further work must be done to develop early detection tools capable of distinguishing between the various EOC subtypes. In this paper, we present a sophisticated analytical pipeline based on solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and three orthogonal LC/MS acquisition modes that facilitates the comprehensive mapping of a wide range of analytes in serum samples from patients with EOC. PLS-DA multivariate analysis of the metabolomic data was able to provide clear discrimination between all four main EOC subtypes: serous, endometrioid, clear cell, and mucinous carcinomas. The prognostic performance of discriminative metabolites and lipids was confirmed via multivariate receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis (AUC value > 88% with 20 features). Further pathway analysis using the top 57 dysregulated metabolic features showed distinct differences in amino acid, lipid, and steroids metabolism among the four EOC subtypes. Thus, metabolomic profiling can serve as a powerful tool for complementing histology in classifying EOC subtypes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".