Modeling and Simulation of a Reduced-Order Single-Phase PQ Inverter Using the Dynamic Phasor Method
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The accurate study of an inverter-based energy source is usually performed with the detailed inverter model. However, to perform system-level studies in microgrids, the time to simulate the system increases exponentially as more de-tailed inverter models are added. This paper presents a computationally efficient model of a single-phase PQ inverter based on the dynamic phasor (DP) method. By using the PQ theory and establishing a relationship between the direct-quadrature axis components of the synchronous reference frame and the DP real and imaginary components, independent control of the active and reactive power is realized. The fidelity of the DP-based single-phase PQ inverter model is verified by validating it against a detailed single-phase PQ inverter model implemented in Simulink/Simscape (SS). Simulation results reveal that the DP model can predict transients accurately, using a step size 125 times larger than the detailed SS model’s step size. The proposed DP-based PQ inverter model is suitable for fast-paced system-level studies of a multiple inverter based single-phase microgrid.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".