MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3212549736 · doi:10.1177/11206721211054972

Wide-field optical coherence tomography imaging in diabetic retinopathy

2021· article· en· W3212549736 on OpenAlex
İlkay Kılıç Müftüoğlu, Gagan Kalra, Mohammed Abdul Rasheed, Carlo Cagini, Ramkailash Gujar, Kiran Kumar Vupparaboina, Sumit Randhir Singh, Marco Lupidi, Jay Chhablani

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Ophthalmology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOptical coherence tomographyMedicineDiabetic retinopathyOphthalmologyTomographyRetinopathyOptometryRadiologyDiabetes mellitus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To report the individual retinal layer thicknesses up to mid-equator in patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR) using Spectralis (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany) wide-field optical coherence tomography (OCT). METHODS: Retinal layers were segmented using a custom designed semi-automated algorithm, where reference points were marked by the examiner to enable software to automatically compute the thickness values of each retinal sublayer at an interval of 1 mm from reference points. The values of individual retinal thicknesses in eyes with varying severity of DR were compared with the values of healthy subjects. Generalized estimating equation was performed to compensate for inclusion of both eyes of patients. RESULTS: A total of 64 patients (119 eyes) with a mean age of 68.97 ± 10.27 years were included. Overall, ganglion cell layer (GCL)/ inner plexiform layer (IPL) complex (-31.67 microns, p < 0.001), outer plexiform layer (-6.78 microns, p = 0.002) and photoreceptor layer (-22.90 microns, p < 0.001) showed significant thinning, while outer nuclear layer thickening ( + 68.19 microns, <0.001) was noted in eyes with DM compared to healthy subjects. Thickness changes were significantly more in the macular segment compared to nasal and temporal segments. GCL/ IPL complex and photoreceptor layers were found to be significantly thin in all grades of DR. CONCLUSION: Retinal thicknesses vary significantly in patients with diabetic retinopathy and understanding patterns of these changes across different segments of the wide field OCT may help better elucidate the natural progression of the disease in terms of retinal anatomy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.205
Threshold uncertainty score0.542

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it