PELAKSANAAN KEGIATAN JUM’AT TAQWA DALAM PEMBENTUKAN KARAKTER PESERTA DIDIK
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Kegiatan Jum’at Taqwa merupakan kegiatan yang dilaksanakan setiap hari jum’at pagi yang bergerak dibidang keagamaan.Kegiatan ini bertujuan untuk menambah wawasan dan pengetahuan siswa tentang ajaran agama.Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian kualitatif. Sedangkan teknik analisis data menggunakan metode deskriptif kualitatif yairu mendeskripsikan data yang dikumpulkan berupa kata-kata. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan teknik observasi, wawancara, angket, serta dokumentasi. Objek dalam penelitian ini adalah 4 orang guru sebagai informan dan 45 siswa sebagai respoden angket.Kegiatan Jum’at Taqwa di SMP Seri Tanjung, sudah dilaksanakan dengan baik. Hal ini dapat dilihat dari jadwal kegiatan jum’at taqwa yang sudah berjalan rutin yakni setiap hari jum’at.Kegiatan ini dapat memberi dampak positif bagi siswa diantaranya siswa dapat memperlancar bacaan surah yasin,siswa dapat membaca dzikir dan siswa mendapat nasihat agama.faktor yang menghambat pada kegiatan ini yakni kurangnya kapasitas tempat pelaksanaan, dan masih ada siswa yang belum lancar membaca surah yasin.Namun Usaha terus dibenahi untuk mengatasi permasalahan faktor penghambat tersebut.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.051 | 0.019 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".