Autism in infants of recent immigration : explanatory models in families from Maghreb countries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette etude qualitative ethnographique documente les systemes de croyance et les choix therapeutiques de dix parents immigrants originaires du Maghreb et ayant un enfant diagnostique avec un trouble du spectre autistique au Quebec. Des entrevues semi-structurees des parents et une observation participante lors de rencontres de soutien pour les meres ont ete effectuees. Nos resultats montrent un tableau polysemique ou coexistent des systemes explicatifs biomedicaux, religieux et traditionnels. Ces differentes croyances influencent les choix therapeutiques des parents qui font appel a la fois aux approches modernes communement acceptees au Canada et aux therapies spirituelles ou traditionnelles acceptees au Maghreb. La religion joue un role particulierement important dans l’acceptation de la condition de l’enfant. Une ouverture et un respect face aux croyances des parents et leurs choix therapeutiques sont des elements-cles pour faciliter l’alliance avec ces derniers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".