MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3212578535 · doi:10.18280/mmep.080519

Numerical Solution of Two-Parameter Singularly Perturbed Convection-Diffusion Boundary Value Problems via Fourth Order Compact Finite Difference Method

2021· article· en· W3212578535 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicDifferential Equations and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompact finite differenceMathematicsTridiagonal matrixFinite difference methodBoundary value problemNumerical analysisFinite differenceConvergence (economics)Applied mathematicsNumerical solution of the convection–diffusion equationMathematical analysisFinite element methodMixed finite element methodEigenvalues and eigenvectorsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, we have developed a fourth order compact finite difference method for finding the numerical solution of two-parameter singularly perturbed convection-diffusion boundary value problems. We have used fourth order compact finite difference method on uniform mesh which provides a tridiagonal linear system of equations. The convergence analysis of the proposed method is established through a matrix analysis approach and it is proved that present method gives fourth order convergence results. Present method is implemented on two numerical examples for checking the efficiency and precision of the method. Numerical outcomes are exhibited which supports the theoretical outcomes. Numerical outcomes are compared with other existing methods and found that present method gives more accurate approximate solution as compare to the other existing methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.335
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it