MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3212648360 · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109975

Sox6 expression distinguishes dorsally and ventrally biased dopamine neurons in the substantia nigra with distinctive properties and embryonic origins

2021· article· en· W3212648360 on OpenAlexaff
Milagros Pereira Luppi, Maite Azcorra, Giuliana Caronia-Brown, Jean‐François Poulin, Zachary Gaertner, Serafin Gatica, Oscar Andrés Moreno-Ramos, Navid Nouri, Marilyn Dubois, Yongchao Ma, Charu Ramakrishnan, Lief E. Fenno, Yoon-Seok Kim, Karl Deisseroth, Francesca Cicchetti, Daniel A. Dombeck, Rajeshwar Awatramani

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Reports · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversité LavalMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersNational Institute on Drug AbuseNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institute of Mental HealthNational Institute on AgingNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsSubstantia nigraEmbryonic stem cellDopamineBiologyNeuroscienceExpression (computer science)MidbrainAnatomyGeneticsDopaminergicGeneCentral nervous systemComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

neurons project to the medial, ventral, and caudal striatum and respond to rewards. Moreover, we show that this adult division is encoded early in development. Overall, our work demonstrates a dual origin of the SNc that results in DA neuron cohorts with distinct molecular profiles, projections, and functions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations98
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell ReportsSame topicNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsFrench-language works237,207